Pages

Labels

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Henry VIII’s Royal Inquisition

0 comments

Idea contributed by: S.R.

Henry VIII’s Royal Inquisition: To keep the sanctity of His Majesty’s royal name and ensure his achievements and contribution to society are not downplayed before the drama of the six royal ladies.

The Inquisition will bring to justice those who fail to accept the Supremacy and goodness in all matters of King Henry VIII. Anyone who flout the just laws of the Henrican Inquisition will be justly punished by having all their sensible Tudor books confiscated. Those who persist with even greater crimes will have to read the books of Alison Weir for a month straight.

All suspects may be force-fed on Henry’s favourite black pudding, boar’s head and artichokes until they confess, at the discretion of the questioner.

List of forbidden acts:

  • Propaganda talk against Henry.
  • Call Henry that “fat, old tyrant” without checking their facts.
  • Stress too much on his tiresome wives.
  • Fans of Katherine de Aragon, Anne Boleyn, Thomas Cromwell and Thomas More must realize that their primary allegiance is to Henry, and not to the lesser characters.
  • Floating conspiracy theories against our beloved king.
  • Anything else that displeases the Inquisitor-General, yours truly!

Our aim is to rid the world of those who seek to seduce faithful Henricans to the Dark side and all good citizens shall rise to the cause by informing of any dissenters, or shall be held guilty themselves.

No one expects the Henrican Inquisition!

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Henry VIII - King among Kings

1 comments

It has been 463 years since the most notorious and eventful life came to an end. King Henry VIII died on 28th January 1547 leaving behind a legacy of many things yet unheard or even spoken of. The man whose name has been much maligned over the centuries is today known only for his six wives. Six wives, as if they are important in any way. This article is a tribute to the man and his achievements.

Crowned at the young age of 18, Henry realised the potential to transform England into a strong presence in Europe from a small strife-filled island nation. He built the first ever gunship for England, the Mary Rose, named after his sister. Simultaneous twin wins on the French and Scottish borders led to England becoming a force in the region. He not only built the navy from scratch but in his lifetime it became a force to be dealt with. He fortified the entire coastal area with forts. Much of the money gained from the dissolution of the monasteries was poured into the Navy, and not into his pockets as is usually believed. In short, he earned his epithet of the Father of the English Navy.

Henry was a scholar and had an amazing sense of culture. Unlike his father who was a soldier through and through, he encouraged arts and literature during his reign. He himself was a great musician and his best works included ‘Greensleeves’ and ‘Pasttime with good company’, the latter reputed to have been written for his first wife. Earning the title of Defender of the Faith (which British monarchs still use, ha!), he cocked his finger at the title giver, the Pope, when he stepped beyond his limits. Henry also commissioned several artists and built numerous castles. Several of his castles still exist and though, it emptied the coffers, what a way to do it! Something that provides us with pleasure half a century later can certainly not be called a waste of money.

“As a means of marrying Anne Boleyn, Henry broke with the Church in Rome.” How simplistic! Henry went through seven years of hell, wishing to marry the woman he loved, refraining from sex and battling royalty and established religion for her sake. Touch of Galahad? He defended himself in his trials and in the end, got what he wanted along with a lot of other incentives. Did this lead to trouble? Yes. Did he have a choice? No. Were the long-term effects good? Definitely!

A sportsman of the first order, Henry was an expert jouster, archer, tennis player, hunter and wrestler. Whether he won or lost, he played the game and played it well. He popularised the game of tennis all over Europe or today it would be lost to the world. He also was into falconry and owned about a hundred albino falcons. His deer parks were teeming with deer in the season and were famous for their sport. His famous meetings with Francis I of France always included some form of sport or the other, in which he himself participated. It is not often that Kings indulge in sports rather than war.

Henry was a man, a King, and undoubtedly, the rarest that lived in his time, or ever. This is not to make him a god; he was never a saint. But he was a man, who believed in himself and his destiny, who did all he could to get what he wanted, who ruled with an iron hand and brought stability to a strife-filled nation; who in fact, made a nation. In all that I have heard or read, I have yet to find one King equal to him. His achievements were many but they are now bowed down under the weight of his few “cruel” actions, necessary for a man in his circumstance. I have simply presented the man behind the King, this man whose achievements have been set aside in order that the less informed might crib about his “cruelty” and “tyranny”.

The King is dead, long live the King - in our memories!



Thursday, December 31, 2009

Jingoism in history

0 comments
History is a field that should teach us a lot - provided that we are willing to learn. The fascination of history itself lies in the simple fact that no one really knows what happened. As my favourite historian once said "There is no fun in really being there, the fun comes from sifting through available materials and coming to a conclusion, but still not knowing whether you are right or wrong."

So how is everyone so convinced that history is one-sided? I remember how in school, all the history books would give historical information based on the political climate. I mean, how does it matter what is going on now? It has absolutely no bearing on what happened before. Even if politics is not kept out of schools, history is! Jingoism does not go along with history. We might be a great nation, but distorting facts or interpreting them on a tangent is doing a disservice to our heritage.

Jodha Akbar was a bad movie historically, but Akbar did have several Rajput wives ... why dispute it? Hitler might have been the cornerstone of evil done to Jews, but why conveniently forget that the majority of the people of Germany, Poland and Austria supported him? Alexander might have lost his final war, but why forget that he connected Europe, Africa and Asia? Historical figures are people, and hence have several dimensions.

Nationalistic history or history as something unshakeable is a pet hate of mine, and hence this blog to kick off my first contribution. Discussion is what keeps history alive, so let's go ahead and do it!

Why blast from the past?

1 comments


I started this blog to meet people who are just as passionate about History as I am. Since early childhood I started growing up listening to stories of Shivaji who established the Maratha kingdom against the grain of Mughal dominance. The stories were exciting but incomplete was the idea of what it probably took a small chieftain to establish an empire during the 1600s in India. As I grew up the interest in history increased thanks to very amateurish chapters in our history books in school. Life in ancient times was coloured as idealistic and simplistic. Someone invaded someone because they had a lust for power and that was enough reason.
Now that I am much older and have more resources than just amatuerish books for reading up on Hisotry, I must say I am enchanted by it. I think we have lessons to be learnt from History...

The main lesson we need to learn in my opinion is our parochial and provincial ego which rears up and holds on to some distorted parts of history. A few months ago I read a excellent article online which was raising this point if Emperor Ashoka was truly as Great as he is potrayed. The points raised were simple; What is the proof of Ashoka's acehivement except his brilliant piece of Public relations effort of putting up monuments, pillars and edicts writing his story in stone. But who wrote this ? Another poignant point was did'nt Ashoka's Mauryan empire crumble within 2-3 years after his death. Does it mean the Mauryan empire already had provincial power centers and a sense of disenchantment?

Once I tried to put these points across to some friends who lambasted me as being a radical, pseudo secularist and sometimes even a Muslim pacifist. But no one could tell me with absolute certainty as to if there were any real documents to prove other than Ashoka's own edicts that things were exactly the same in those days as is claimed.

That is when I decided to start this blog. Let people correct me or make me think of alternative theories. If we have to learn from History that asking difficult questions is a good virtue rather than a unacceptable one. Lately we have seen many historians being silenced in the name of culture and sometimes because they have raised unacceptable questions. Confront these questions as even if the historical heroes we so love, they still were human and lived amongst humans. They obviously made mistakes.

I am not a historian and my knowledge is at best amateurish. I welcome any comments and if you want to write on this blog, do comment to this post. Please do keep your comments sensible and non-abusive. This blog moderates the comments and hence any abuse will never make it to publishing anyways.

thanks

Ancient Rocks